Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 33
Filtrar
1.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 73(18): 420-422, 2024 May 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38722805

RESUMEN

Mycobacterium abscessus is an intrinsically drug-resistant, rapidly growing, nontuberculous mycobacterium; extrapulmonary infections have been reported in association with medical tourism (1). During November-December 2022, two Colorado hospitals (hospitals A and B) treated patient A, a Colorado woman aged 30-39 years, for M. abscessus meningitis. In October 2022, she had received intrathecal donor embryonic stem cell injections in Baja California, Mexico to treat multiple sclerosis and subsequently experienced headaches and fevers, consistent with meningitis. Her cerebrospinal fluid revealed neutrophilic pleocytosis and grew M. abscessus in culture at hospital A. Hospital A's physicians consulted hospital B's infectious diseases (ID) physicians to co-manage this patient (2).


Asunto(s)
Brotes de Enfermedades , Infecciones por Mycobacterium no Tuberculosas , Mycobacterium abscessus , Humanos , Colorado/epidemiología , Adulto , Femenino , México/epidemiología , Mycobacterium abscessus/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones por Mycobacterium no Tuberculosas/epidemiología , Arizona/epidemiología , Trasplante de Células Madre
3.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 45(4): 483-490, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37982245

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To learn about the perceptions of healthcare personnel (HCP) on the barriers they encounter when performing infection prevention and control (IPC) practices in labor and delivery to help inform future IPC resources tailored to this setting. DESIGN: Qualitative focus groups. SETTING: Labor and delivery units in acute-care settings. PARTICIPANTS: A convenience sample of labor and delivery HCP attending the Infectious Diseases Society for Obstetrics and Gynecology 2022 Annual Meeting. METHODS: Two focus groups, each lasting 45 minutes, were conducted by a team from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. A standardized script facilitated discussion around performing IPC practices during labor and delivery. Coding was performed by 3 reviewers using an immersion-crystallization technique. RESULTS: In total, 18 conference attendees participated in the focus groups: 67% obstetrician-gynecologists, 17% infectious disease physicians, 11% medical students, and 6% an obstetric anesthesiologist. Participants described the difficulty of consistently performing IPC practices in this setting because they often respond to emergencies, are an entry point to the hospital, and frequently encounter bodily fluids. They also described that IPC training and education is not specific to labor and delivery, and personal protective equipment is difficult to locate when needed. Participants observed a lack of standardization of IPC protocols in their setting and felt that healthcare for women and pregnant people is not prioritized on a larger scale and within their hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified barriers to consistently implementing IPC practices in the labor and delivery setting. These barriers should be addressed through targeted interventions and the development of obstetric-specific IPC resources.


Asunto(s)
Obstetricia , Médicos , Embarazo , Femenino , Humanos , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Personal de Salud , Atención a la Salud
4.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 44(12): 2052-2055, 2023 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37929567

RESUMEN

In this summary of US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) consultations with state and local health departments concerning their bronchoscope-associated investigations from 2014 through 2022, bronchoscope reprocessing gaps and exposure to nonsterile water sources appeared to be the major routes of transmission of infectious pathogens, which were primarily water-associated bacteria.


Asunto(s)
Broncoscopios , Enfermedades Transmisibles , Estados Unidos , Humanos , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Derivación y Consulta , Agua
6.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 44(5): 695-720, 2023 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37137483

RESUMEN

The intent of this document is to highlight practical recommendations in a concise format designed to assist acute-care hospitals in implementing and prioritizing their surgical-site infection (SSI) prevention efforts. This document updates the Strategies to Prevent Surgical Site Infections in Acute Care Hospitals published in 2014. This expert guidance document is sponsored by the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA). It is the product of a collaborative effort led by SHEA, the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology (APIC), the American Hospital Association (AHA), and The Joint Commission, with major contributions from representatives of a number of organizations and societies with content expertise.


Asunto(s)
Control de Infecciones , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica , Estados Unidos , Humanos , Hospitales
8.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 44(7): 1187-1192, 2023 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35591783

RESUMEN

We describe a large outbreak of severe acute respiratory coronavirus virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) involving an acute-care hospital emergency department during December 2020 and January 2021, in which 27 healthcare personnel worked while infectious, resulting in multiple opportunities for SARS-CoV-2 transmission to patients and other healthcare personnel. We provide recommendations for improving infection prevention and control.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , Brotes de Enfermedades , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Hospitales
9.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 71(48): 1517-1521, 2022 Dec 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36454695

RESUMEN

In July 2021, the Virginia Department of Health notified CDC of a cluster of eight invasive infections with Burkholderia stabilis, a bacterium in the Burkholderia cepacia complex (BCC), among hospitalized patients at hospital A. Most patients had undergone ultrasound-guided procedures during their admission. Culture of MediChoice M500812 nonsterile ultrasound gel used in hospital A revealed contamination of unopened product with B. stabilis that matched the whole genome sequencing (WGS) of B. stabilis strains found among patients. CDC and hospital A, in collaboration with partner health care facilities, state and local health departments, and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), identified 119 B. stabilis infections in 10 U.S. states, leading to the national recall of all ultrasound gel products produced by Eco-Med Pharmaceutical (Eco-Med), the manufacturer of MediChoice M500812. Additional investigation of health care facility practices revealed frequent use of nonsterile ultrasound gel to assist with visualization in preparation for or during invasive, percutaneous procedures (e.g., intravenous catheter insertion). This practice could have allowed introduction of contaminated ultrasound gel into sterile body sites when gel and associated viable bacteria were not completely removed from skin, leading to invasive infections. This outbreak highlights the importance of appropriate use of ultrasound gel within health care settings to help prevent patient infections, including the use of only sterile, single-use ultrasound gel for ultrasonography when subsequent percutaneous procedures might be performed.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Burkholderia , Brotes de Enfermedades , Contaminación de Equipos , Instituciones de Salud , Humanos , Contaminación de Medicamentos , Ultrasonografía , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Geles , Infecciones por Burkholderia/epidemiología , Infecciones por Burkholderia/etiología
10.
J Public Health Manag Pract ; 28(6): 682-692, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36194814

RESUMEN

CONTEXT: Between April 2020 and May 2021, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) awarded more than $40 billion to health departments nationwide for COVID-19 prevention and response activities. One of the identified priorities for this investment was improving infection prevention and control (IPC) in nursing homes. PROGRAM: CDC developed a virtual course to train new and less experienced public health staff in core healthcare IPC principles and in the application of CDC COVID-19 healthcare IPC guidance for nursing homes. IMPLEMENTATION: From October 2020 to August 2021, the CDC led training sessions for 12 cohorts of public health staff using pretraining reading materials, case-based scenarios, didactic presentations, peer-learning opportunities, and subject matter expert-led discussions. Multiple electronic assessments were distributed to learners over time to measure changes in self-reported knowledge and confidence and to collect feedback on the course. Participating public health programs were also assessed to measure overall course impact. EVALUATION: Among 182 enrolled learners, 94% completed the training. Most learners were infection preventionists (42%) or epidemiologists (38%), had less than 1 year of experience in their health department role (75%), and had less than 1 year of subject matter experience (54%). After training, learners reported increased knowledge and confidence in applying the CDC COVID-19 healthcare IPC guidance for nursing homes (≥81%) with the greatest increase in performing COVID-19 IPC consultations and assessments (87%). The majority of participating programs agreed that the course provided an overall benefit (88%) and reduced training burden (72%). DISCUSSION: The CDC's virtual course was effective in increasing public health capacity for COVID-19 healthcare IPC in nursing homes and provides a possible model to increase IPC capacity for other infectious diseases and other healthcare settings. Future virtual healthcare IPC courses could be enhanced by tailoring materials to health department needs, reinforcing training through applied learning experiences, and supporting mechanisms to retain trained staff.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Personal de Salud/educación , Humanos , Control de Infecciones , Casas de Salud , Salud Pública
12.
J Public Health Manag Pract ; 28(2): 116-125, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32332484

RESUMEN

CONTEXT: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention awarded $85 million to health care-associated infection and antibiotic resistance (HAI/AR) programs in March 2015 as part of Infection Control Assessment and Response (ICAR) activities in the Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity cooperative agreement Domestic Ebola Supplement. PROGRAM: One goal of this funding was to assess and improve program capacity to respond to potential health care outbreaks (eg, HAI clusters). All 55 funded programs (in 49 state and 6 local health departments) participated. IMPLEMENTATION: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention developed guidance and tools for HAI/AR programs to document relevant response capacities, assess policies, and measure progress. HAI/AR programs completed an interim assessment in 2016 and a final progress report in 2017. EVALUATION: During the project period, 78% (n = 43) of the programs developed new investigation tools, 85% (n = 47) trained staff on outbreak response, and 96% (n = 53) of the programs reported hiring staff to assist with outbreak response activities. Staffing and expertise to support HAI outbreak response increased substantially among awardees reporting staffing limitations on the interim assessment, including in domains such as on-site infection control assessment (n = 20; 83%), laboratory capacity (n = 20; 91%), and data management/analytics (n = 14; 67%). By 2017, reporting requirements in 100% of the programs addressed possible HAI/AR outbreaks; 93% (n = 51) also addressed sentinel events such as identification of novel AR threats. More than 90% (n = 50) of programs enhanced capacities for tracking response activities; in 2016, these systems captured 6665 events (range, 3-1379; median = 46). Health departments also reported wide-ranging efforts to engage regulatory, public health, and health care partners to improve HAI/AR outbreak reporting and investigation. DISCUSSION: Broad capacity for responding to HAI/AR outbreaks was enhanced using Ebola ICAR supplemental funding. As response activities expand, health department programs will be challenged to continue building expertise, reporting infrastructure, investigation resources, and effective relations with health care partners.


Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria , Fiebre Hemorrágica Ebola , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Atención a la Salud , Brotes de Enfermedades/prevención & control , Fiebre Hemorrágica Ebola/epidemiología , Humanos , Salud Pública , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
13.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 43(10): 1333-1338, 2022 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34612179

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In 2015, an international outbreak of Mycobacterium chimaera infections among patients undergoing cardiothoracic surgeries was associated with exposure to contaminated LivaNova 3T heater-cooler devices (HCDs). From June 2017 to October 2020, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention was notified of 18 patients with M. chimaera infections who had undergone cardiothoracic surgeries at 2 hospitals in Kansas (14 patients) and California (4 patients); 17 had exposure to 3T HCDs. Whole-genome sequencing of the clinical and environmental isolates matched the global outbreak strain identified in 2015. METHODS: Investigations were conducted at each hospital to determine the cause of ongoing infections. Investigative methods included query of microbiologic records to identify additional cases, medical chart review, observations of operating room setup, HCD use and maintenance practices, and collection of HCD and environmental samples. RESULTS: Onsite observations identified deviations in the positioning and maintenance of the 3T HCDs from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recommendations and the manufacturer's updated cleaning and disinfection protocols. Additionally, most 3T HCDs had not undergone the recommended vacuum and sealing upgrades by the manufacturer to decrease the dispersal of M. chimaera-containing aerosols into the operating room, despite hospital requests to the manufacturer. CONCLUSIONS: These findings highlight the need for continued awareness of the risk of M. chimaera infections associated with 3T HCDs, even if the devices are newly manufactured. Hospitals should maintain vigilance in adhering to FDA recommendations and the manufacturer's protocols and in identifying patients with potential M. chimaera infections with exposure to these devices.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Mycobacterium no Tuberculosas , Infecciones por Mycobacterium , Humanos , Contaminación de Equipos , Kansas , Quimera , Infecciones por Mycobacterium/epidemiología , Infecciones por Mycobacterium/etiología , Complejo Mycobacterium avium , Aerosoles , Infecciones por Mycobacterium no Tuberculosas/epidemiología , Infecciones por Mycobacterium no Tuberculosas/etiología , Infecciones por Mycobacterium no Tuberculosas/prevención & control
14.
JAMA Netw Open ; 4(10): e2128615, 2021 10 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34618037

RESUMEN

Importance: The number of clinics marketing stem cell products for joint diseases, chronic pain, and most recently, COVID-19, has increased despite warnings from the US Food and Drug Administration that stem cell products for these and other indications have not been proven safe or effective. Objective: To examine bacterial infections in 20 patients who received umbilical cord blood-derived products marketed as stem cell treatment. Design, Setting, and Participants: This case series is a national public health investigation including case-finding, medical record review and abstraction, and laboratory investigation, including sterility testing of products and whole-genome sequencing of patient and product isolates. Participants included patients who developed bacterial infections following administration of umbilical cord blood-derived products marketed as stem cell treatment during August 2017 to September 2018. Data analysis was performed from March 2019 to September 2021. Exposures: Umbilical cord blood-derived products marketed as stem cell treatment. Main Outcomes and Measures: Data were collected on patient infections and exposures. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention performed sterility testing on undistributed and distributed vials of product marketed as stem cell treatment and performed whole-genome sequencing to compare patient and product bacterial isolates. Results: Culture-confirmed bacterial infections were identified in 20 patients (median [range] age, 63 [2-89] years; 13 male patients [65%]) from 8 US states who sought stem cell treatment for conditions including pain, osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, and injury; all but 1 required hospitalization. The most frequently isolated bacteria from patients with infections were common enteric species, including Escherichia coli (14 patients) and Enterobacter cloacae (7 patients). Of unopened, undistributed products sampled for testing, 65% (22 of 34 vials) were contaminated with at least 1 of 16 bacterial species, mostly enteric. A patient isolate from Arizona matched isolates obtained from products administered to patients in Florida, and patient isolates from Texas matched undistributed product sent from the company in California. Conclusions and Relevance: Unapproved stem cell products can expose patients to serious risks without proven benefit. Sequencing results suggest a common source of extensive contamination, likely occurring during the processing of cord blood into product. Patients and health care practitioners who are considering the use of unapproved products marketed as stem cell treatment should be aware of their unproven benefits and potential risks, including serious infections.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Bacterianas/etiología , Seguridad de la Sangre/estadística & datos numéricos , Trasplante de Células Madre de Sangre del Cordón Umbilical/efectos adversos , Brotes de Enfermedades , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Infecciones Bacterianas/epidemiología , Infecciones Bacterianas/prevención & control , Seguridad de la Sangre/normas , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Niño , Preescolar , Trasplante de Células Madre de Sangre del Cordón Umbilical/normas , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Mercadotecnía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Vigilancia en Salud Pública , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , United States Food and Drug Administration , Adulto Joven
15.
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf ; 46(9): 531-541, 2020 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32600952

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Beginning in October 2016, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) issued expanded guidance requiring accrediting organizations and state survey agencies to report serious infection control breaches to relevant state health departments. This project sought to characterize and summarize The Joint Commission's early experiences and findings in applying this guidance to facilities accredited under the ambulatory and office-based surgery programs in 2017. METHODS: Surveyor notes were retrospectively reviewed to identify individual breaches, and then the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Infection Prevention Checklist for Outpatient Settings was used to categorize and code documented breaches. RESULTS: Of 845 ambulatory organizations, 39 (4.6%) had breaches observed during the survey process and reported to health departments. Within these organizations, surveyors documented 356 breaches, representing 52 different breach codes. Common breach domains were sterilization of reusable devices, device reprocessing observation, device reprocessing, disinfection of reusable devices, and infection control program and infrastructure. Eight of the 39 facilities (20.5%) were cited for not performing the minimum level of reprocessing based on the items' intended use, reusing single-use devices, and/or not using aseptic technique to prepare injections. CONCLUSION: The CMS infection control breach reporting requirement has helped highlight some of the challenges faced by ambulatory facilities in providing a safe care environment for their patients. This analysis identified numerous opportunities for improved staff training and competencies as well as leadership oversight and investment in necessary resources. More systematic assessments of infection control practices, extending to both accredited and nonaccredited ambulatory facilities, are needed to inform oversight and prevention efforts.


Asunto(s)
Medicare , Salud Pública , Anciano , Atención Ambulatoria , Humanos , Control de Infecciones , Derivación y Consulta , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos
16.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 69(15): 472-476, 2020 Apr 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32298249

RESUMEN

On February 26, 2020, the first U.S. case of community-acquired coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) was confirmed in a patient hospitalized in Solano County, California (1). The patient was initially evaluated at hospital A on February 15; at that time, COVID-19 was not suspected, as the patient denied travel or contact with symptomatic persons. During a 4-day hospitalization, the patient was managed with standard precautions and underwent multiple aerosol-generating procedures (AGPs), including nebulizer treatments, bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPAP) ventilation, endotracheal intubation, and bronchoscopy. Several days after the patient's transfer to hospital B, a real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (real-time RT-PCR) test for SARS-CoV-2 returned positive. Among 121 hospital A health care personnel (HCP) who were exposed to the patient, 43 (35.5%) developed symptoms during the 14 days after exposure and were tested for SARS-CoV-2; three had positive test results and were among the first known cases of probable occupational transmission of SARS-CoV-2 to HCP in the United States. Little is known about specific risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 transmission in health care settings. To better characterize and compare exposures among HCP who did and did not develop COVID-19, standardized interviews were conducted with 37 hospital A HCP who were tested for SARS-CoV-2, including the three who had positive test results. Performing physical examinations and exposure to the patient during nebulizer treatments were more common among HCP with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 than among those without COVID-19; HCP with COVID-19 also had exposures of longer duration to the patient. Because transmission-based precautions were not in use, no HCP wore personal protective equipment (PPE) recommended for COVID-19 patient care during contact with the index patient. Health care facilities should emphasize early recognition and isolation of patients with possible COVID-19 and use of recommended PPE to minimize unprotected, high-risk HCP exposures and protect the health care workforce.


Asunto(s)
Betacoronavirus/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Coronavirus/transmisión , Transmisión de Enfermedad Infecciosa de Paciente a Profesional , Personal de Hospital , Neumonía Viral/diagnóstico , Neumonía Viral/transmisión , Adulto , COVID-19 , California/epidemiología , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Femenino , Hospitalización , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Exposición Profesional , Pandemias , Equipo de Protección Personal/estadística & datos numéricos , Personal de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Medición de Riesgo , SARS-CoV-2
18.
Mayo Clin Proc ; 95(2): 243-254, 2020 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31883694

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To summarize patient notifications resulting from unsafe injection practices by health care personnel in the United States and describe recommended actions for prevention and response. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We examined records of events involving communications to groups of patients, conducted from January 1, 2012, through December 31, 2018, in which bloodborne pathogen testing was recommended or offered because of potential exposure to unsafe injection practices by health care personnel in the United States. Information compiled included: health care setting(s), type of unsafe injection practice(s), number of patients notified, number of outbreak-associated infections, and whether evidence suggesting bloodborne pathogen transmission prompted the notification. We compared these numbers with a similar review conducted from January 1, 2001, through December 31, 2011. RESULTS: From 2012 through 2018, more than 66,748 patients were notified as part of 38 patient notification events. Twenty-one involved exposures in non-hospital settings. Twenty-five involved syringe and/or needle reuse in the context of routine patient care; 11 involved drug tampering by a health care provider. The majority of events (n=25) were prompted by identification of unsafe injection practices alone, absent any documented infections at the time of notification. Outbreak-associated hepatitis B virus and/or hepatitis C virus infections were documented for 11 of the events; 8 involved patient-to-patient transmission, and 3 involved provider-to-patient transmission. CONCLUSIONS: Since 2001, nearly 200,000 patients in the United States were notified about potential exposure to blood-contaminated medications or injection equipment. Facility leadership has an obligation to ensure adherence to safe injection practices and to respond properly if unsafe injection practices are identified.


Asunto(s)
Comunicación , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Equipo Reutilizado/estadística & datos numéricos , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Inyecciones/efectos adversos , Errores Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Jeringas , Patógenos Transmitidos por la Sangre , Infección Hospitalaria/etiología , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Infección Hospitalaria/transmisión , Brotes de Enfermedades/prevención & control , Brotes de Enfermedades/estadística & datos numéricos , Hepatitis B/epidemiología , Hepatitis B/transmisión , Hepatitis C/epidemiología , Hepatitis C/transmisión , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
20.
J Fungi (Basel) ; 5(3)2019 Jul 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31344775

RESUMEN

This report serves as a guide for investigating mucormycosis infections in healthcare. We describe lessons learned from previous outbreaks and offer methods and tools that can aid in these investigations. We also offer suggestions for conducting environmental assessments, implementing infection control measures, and initiating surveillance to ensure that interventions were effective. While not all investigations of mucormycosis infections will identify a single source, all can potentially lead to improvements in infection control.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...